Crowdsourcing Platform Development for Internet Startup
-
Web Development
- $50,000 to $199,999
- Jan. 2010 - Ongoing
- Quality
- 5.0
- Schedule
- 5.0
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"[T]hey always have very good justification for the work they do."
- Other industries
- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- 11-50 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
IT Craft developed a custom information and crowdsourcing portal. They provided project managers, developers, engineers, designers, and quality assurance testers.
The application quickly earned a reputation as the leading portal in its space. IT Craft impressed with their flexibility, trustworthiness, and ability to employ agile methodologies and continuous processes. They understood every project detail and always stayed on schedule and within budget.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your organization.
We are a business specialized in an emerging technology, namely crowdsourcing and crowdfunding novels.
What is your position?
I'm the founder.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What business challenge were you trying to address with IT Craft?
Part of our strategy involved developing a leading information portal as a way of branding ourselves as an establishing network. I hired IT Craft to build our web-based information portal. It included a large element of crowdsourcing information. There was a lot of technology built into the platform to allow the community to upload content. It was a sort of collaborative information sharing portal. It later established itself as the leading portal in this space.
SOLUTION
Please describe the scope of their involvement.
The technology they used was PHP, if I remember correctly, with MySQL databases. There was a team of six to eight people at its peak. They had a typical project team, consisting of a project manager, developers, and engineers for building the internal code, designers, and QA [quality assurance] testers. We then had an account manager, Tanya. We had Alex, the project manager, and he was very head on. We would speak to him on a regular basis. They would bring different people into the project, depending on what the current issue was.
We were based in Los Angeles, and they were in Kiev. Obviously, there was a big time difference. That was a limiting factor at times in the beginning, but we eventually got into a good workflow and it was fine.
How did you come to work with IT Craft?
I have a professional consulting background, with many years' experience in helping large companies make procurement decisions, mostly in IT [information technology]. I applied the sort of methodology that we deployed for those large companies. I contacted about eight contractors, selected four, out of which IT Craft and one or two others bid for the actual work.
I've had alot of experience in terms of how to manage the process, and how to sift the potential candidates.
Could you provide a sense of the size of this initiative in financial terms?
It was around $150.000.
What is the status of this engagement?
They only worked on the portal. However, the project's about five years old, and they've supported us from day one. They were involved from the conceptual design to the creation of a very detailed system management specification. We've also had a major facelift, which was another big piece of work. They've continued to support, maintain, and enhance it.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Could you share any statistics or metrics from this engagement?
The first thing to talk about would be my experience with them as a vendor. I was a professional purchaser coming into this, so I have high standards in terms of what I want. When we started the process, it was very structured. They built a 150-page document that very clearly outlined the details of the project from a design and engineering point of view. When our relationship was new, it was regimented around that. As time progressed, my confidence in them grew very high, and we moved to an agile development methodology. Progressively, I felt that they're an efficient company, and everything they built always worked. I can't remember anything that they built and didn't work after their extensive testing. They were very flexible with us after changing our minds on certain items. After a couple of years, I came to trust them so much that we didn't even go through specifications in a formal way. We were literally using agile techniques to build as we went.
Everything worked. They were certainly able to manage the time differences, so that never became an issue. They tend to start late in the day, and work late into the evening, so they found a good working window. They're very accessible.
They have an interesting style and culture. They don't move on until they understand exactly what you want. They took things very seriously. Sometimes, they felt like they might have misunderstood something, so they would keep my team on the phone until they'd understood it thoroughly.
How did IT Craft perform from a project management standpoint?
Everything was delivered before the project deadlines, and I don't believe they ever overbilled me. They've been very efficient with their time, and they always have very good justification for the work they do.
I can't remember specific names of tools we used, but we had ticketing systems. They're very regimented. They have a release methodology, and you're able to see the product in testing, before going into production.
At this scale, there are many entrepreneurs trying to build platforms, who have little experience with the technical work itself and with managing vendors. In this instance, even though I had much experience to apply, they'd be a good find for someone less so than me, in so much as the controls and methodology they use provide a framework within which lesser-experienced people can understand the work and watch its progression.
Is there anything IT Craft could have improved or done differently?
It's been some time since our last collaboration. Our relationship, at the moment, is minimal. I don't have a vested interest in overselling them but, apart from the fact that they have no sense of humor at all (which is sometimes not a bad thing because you know they're focused on the work), there isn't a lot I could say to criticize them. They've been very flexible, and they stayed with the business through bad times and good. They deliver what they say they will and don't overcharge you. I can't make up something bad to say.
RATINGS
-
Quality
5.0Service & Deliverables
"Everything works."
-
Schedule
5.0On time / deadlines
"They delivered early. The only thing I recall is that they have numerous public holidays, and their culture is that they don't work on them. Sometimes, they're not available for a couple of days."
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
"The rate per hour was $0 to 0, so quite cheaper than onshores. It was 0 percent to 0 percent of what I would have paid elsewhere."
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS
"I would recommend them without question.