Branding for Philanthropy Tech Platform
-
Branding
- $10,000 to $49,999
- Jan. 2021 - Ongoing
- Quality
- 4.5
- Schedule
- 5.0
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"There are a few things that have immediately improved thanks to their work."
- Other industries
- New York City, New York
- 11-50 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
Woden helps a philanthropy tech platform differentiate their brand and increase awareness. They’ve done internal research, market and competitor analysis, and used storytelling to produce core brand elements.
Although the implementation stage isn’t over yet, Woden’s efforts are already generating more engagement. Woden has been a collaborative partner, facilitating conversations and supporting the client as it’s needed. They stand out for their ability to give insight and recommendations.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
UpMetrics is a tech platform that targets impact organizations. Our key verticals are foundations, nonprofits, and impact investors, but it could be any corporation that works in their communities to drive change or impact.
We collect and analyze qualitative and quantitative data to identify new areas of opportunity for these organizations. We see the impact they’re making and how that might affect how they talk about themselves to raise money or attract volunteers, or to see if they’re really making a difference where they intend to.
I’m the head of marketing, so I’m in charge of every facet of it. I work on branding, which is where we engage and do awareness work. I also work with sales, solutions, marketing, demand, retention, and more.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Woden?
I started with UpMetrics in the fall of last year, and we were originally thinking about working with a more traditional agency. However, nobody knew us, so we were trying to start the journey of identifying our brand and increasing awareness.
It turned out we didn’t have any sort of data that would allow us to do that in an effective way, so we had to take a step back and ask ourselves who we wanted to be and what our core verticals were. We had to go through that, decide what we wanted to be known for, and really double down there. That’s why we pivoted toward Woden, who had more of a storytelling approach.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
When we initially talked to Woden, they explained their trademark approach. They work with clients to build a story that follows the traditional hero’s journey. Then, they apply that story in different formats to all of the different touch points.
We started with a robust discovery period, which was exactly what we needed. They interviewed our clients and internal people to find out what they were saying about us, and they did competitor and general market analysis. Woden presented all of this information to us, which was very helpful.
From that, we got to the high-level story, where they told us what our mission, vision, unique value proposition, and client situation were. We engaged in collaborative sessions. The whole concept of storytelling and any marketing concept built from this idea of selling your brand through a story was very new to us.
Woden was very good at facilitating conversations, bringing in thoughts, starting questions, and having collaborative notes so that we could hear from everyone involved. We went through that exercise, and they went on from there to translate everything to a few core elements.
We’re currently working on the implementation of some of those items, and they support us in that regard and in the few areas where we need help with the next steps.
What is the team composition?
Hannah (Brand Strategist) is our main point of contact with the team. She’s great, and she’s very accessible via email. We’ve been through quite a few rounds of feedback with her, asking for clarification in her notes and so on.
They have different designers, copywriters, and people of various expertise to provide suggestions. We also had a pretty direct line of communication with one of the managing partners who took us through the importance of narrative and storytelling versus a more traditional branding campaign.
How did you come to work with Woden?
It was through a referral. I've gone through a few rebranding exercises in my past roles in different organizations. I've gone through it when I was in a tech company, and again in a nonprofit. I also did it when I was in publishing. While I was going through the pitches from other traditional agencies, I realized that we didn't have the information when we were going through those rebranding efforts. Some of them didn't go very well; we ended up not taking a lot of what was done because we didn't ask those key questions in the beginning and get that alignment across the organization.
The reason why I chose Woden is because they had a baseline information. Also, they traditionally work a lot with sales which is my key internal partner. Revenue is my biggest indicator of success. I made sure that they were really brought along the ride in other organizations I've been in. It's more marketing and leadership, maybe PR, who does this branding effort, but that does not come across the organization in terms of transparency and collaboration.
How much have you invested with them?
We’ve spent around $25,000–$30,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started working with them in January 2021, and the relationship is ongoing. They just launched a new offering where they’re available for additional help. In our case, since this is new to us, I think we have to go through the internal implementation to get that buy-in, but they do offer it. They’ve also recommended a service that they have, and they’ve connected us with third parties that they’ve worked with for things like website design.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
There are a few things that have immediately improved thanks to their work. First, we were inconsistent about how we talked about ourselves on the website and other sales places, and it was a pretty immediate advantage to have those conversations and internally decide how we wanted to categorize ourselves. Otherwise, it’d be a bit harder, since we’re still in the rollout stage.
Also, I’m using the main themes and points that came out of their exercise in new campaigns. I’m hopeful that those will resonate. Finally, we have been really taking advantage of their work to pin our pain points. The internal and competitor insights they provided directly translated into pain points that I’ve been able to map as different problem statements, and that’s informing all of our customer communication. There aren’t any metrics yet, but those are things that we didn’t have before at all.
In terms of implementation, we’re still a little early in that stage, but the branding has resonated really strongly. We knew what we did before, but we were able to nail down our unique differentiator and use their language to create a slightly more urgent variation that we really needed. We’ve definitely seen higher engagement in response to that.
How did Woden perform from a project management standpoint?
Our main communication method is email. We’ve used Google Drive to share documents so they can go through them and have a better idea of where we are and what needs to be improved. Otherwise, there have been a lot of phone calls, and I’ve had a few check-ins with Hannah. Most of the process has been pretty self-explanatory to me.
It’s been more about getting feedback and identifying where we’re stuck and want to go, which has been challenging for us. It’s been a big educational period; Hannah has actually joined an internal meeting to go through all the competitive research in order to be helpful across teams.
What did you find most impressive about them?
I think sales are their strength, and also applying templates to how we’re talking about ourselves and what we can do for content, social events, fundraising, and so on. We’re soon going to raise more funds for our organization, and they’ve done a really good job at bringing in examples and actual content that will be tremendously useful.
Also, they presented our competitors in a pretty interesting light, which made it easy to see how we compare to them. Those abilities on insight and sales were their biggest strength for me.
Are there any areas they could improve?
Some of the marketing recommendations were a little robust to adjust, like on paid ads and content. However, it’s hard because we’re not paying them on retainer, so it’s not meant to all be done right at once. That’s why the recommendation is so large. Nonetheless, I think it would have been helpful to break it out.
Furthermore, I think ad copy could be a little stronger, but I think it comes down to their whole specialty. Telling a story is less direct-response than an ad, but we still kind of need it.
Any advice for potential customers?
Definitely think ahead of time of what internal coordination needs to look like. Think heavily of that strategy so you can figure out how to get people on board internally. Since I was somewhat new to UpMetrics, I was a little challenged at first. I hadn’t worked with an agency that provided me with so much information, which has been great.
RATINGS
-
Quality
4.5Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
5.0On time / deadlines
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
"We had no research, so it was valuable. If someone has some of that data, the price might go down a little."
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS